A Better Way to Determine Position Size

04/03/2014 6:00 am EST


In running backtests, it’s important to understand the impact of volatility and position size, says Andrew Falde of SMB Training Blog.

A consistent position size in number of shares or dollar amount can greatly skew historic results. If optimizing, this may lead to curve-fitting the system to periods of high volatility. Here are some examples of the impact of fixed-position sizing vs. volatility-based sizing:

The first uses a fixed 1,000-share position size. When the stock price is low, position sizes are reduced and the returns appear smaller. During high-volatility markets and when the stock price is higher (right half of the chart), the P&L swings are exponentially larger. This does not accurately represent the history of the strategy or the market.

Click to Enlarge

The second is the same strategy except now we are using a very basic volatility-based position size. The idea is that we want to have a very similar risk/reward ratio on each trade regardless of market volatility. The method I used in this strategy aims to have a $1,000 P&L change if the market moves 1 ATR (average true range). As you can see, the lower volatility market conditions generate higher returns—and the higher volatility market conditions have smaller swings.

Click to Enlarge

Using a volatility-based position size helps to normalize historic signal returns so that you can find something that is more statistically valid in all market conditions.

Andrew Falde, Contributor, SMB Training Blog

Related Articles on TRADING