The Gravitational 15 gained another +1.7% last week, and it did so against a backdrop of FG4 price a...
Finding domestic emerging market growth stocks
04/12/2011 8:40 am EST
For months I’ve argued that for the United States would be the best performing stock market in the world for the first half of 2011. But that investors shouldn’t get too comfortable with their portfolio allocations because the second half of 2011 looked much rockier for the U.S. and other developed stock markets. Sometime in the spring, I said, investors would want to start shifting the weighting in their portfolios to add more exposure to emerging stock markets.
And in my April 7 post http://jubakpicks.com/2011/04/08/now-its-the-turn-of-worlds-developed-markets-to-be-riskier-for-investors/ I wrote that I thought the time had arrived to start making that re-allocation in investors’ portfolios.
I call this challenge No. 1. It’s not easy to go through an existing portfolio, cull the stocks that you want to sell so that create cash for new investments, and then pick new stocks that you’d like to overweight.
But then there’s challenge No. 2.
The global economy hasn’t stood still while investors enjoyed profits from the U.S. stock market and got ready to shift portfolios toward emerging stock markets. Way back in January I wrote that the U.S. economy was in the early recovery stage of the economic cycle. Developing economies were further along—maybe making a transition from the early recovery to the late recovery. Three months later I think the U.S. economy and the global economy have both moved further along in the economic cycle. And that should change the kinds of stocks that you cull from your U.S. portfolio and the kinds of stocks that you add to your weightings of emerging market stocks.
Adding to your positions in emerging markets right now doesn’t mean going back to the commodities heavy picks of earlier in the global cycle. If you’re going to overweight Brazil, for example, that doesn’t mean just loading up on iron miner Vale (VALE) and oil-producer Petrobras (PBR).
Let me try to explain what meeting Challenges No. 1 and No. 2 does mean right now.
Back in January I laid out Sam Stovall’s scheme for the stages of the economic cycle. (I think 1996 book, "Sector Investing," is still the best resource on the subject.)
Stovall divides the economic cycle into four stages:
- Early recession. You should remember this stage vividly. Consumer sentiment ranges from fear to terror, industrial production plunges, interest rates peak and then start to fall, and unemployment begins to rise rapidly. Sectors that have done well -- relatively, at least -- during this stage include services, near the beginning; utilities; and, near the end of the stage, cyclicals and transports.
- Full recession. Gross domestic product tumbles, interest rates keep falling, and unemployment rises. Sectors that do best during this stage, historically, have been cyclicals and transports, at the beginning of the stage; technology; and, near the end, industrials.
- Early recovery. Consumer sentiment improves, industrial production turns up, interest rates hit bottom, and unemployment peaks and starts to move lower. Sectors that do best are usually industrials, near the beginning of the stage; basic materials; and, near the end, energy.
- Late recovery. Interest rates rise as the central bank tries to control inflation, consumer sentiment heads down, and industrial production is flat. Sectors that have done well in this stage include energy and, near the end of the stage, consumer staples and services.
At that point I argued the U.S. economy was in the early recovery stage so your U.S. portfolio should overweight industrials, basic materials, and, gradually, energy stocks. (And now that the European Central Bank has raised interest rates and the Federal Reserve looks likely to do the same at the end of 2011 or in early 2012, I’d argue that developed economies are on the road to late recovery.)
Emerging markets were further along toward the late recovery stage. Central banks there had already started to raise interest rates, for example.
It’s always dangerous to apply an economic model developed for the economies of the developed world to the emerging economies of a Brazil, China, or India. Growth rates are higher in those developing economies, for one thing, and that means that even in a late recovery stage industrial production is likely to be growing.
But correcting for some of those differences as well as we can, I think it is accurate to say that in a late recovery stage, industrials and basic materials sectors in developing economies have recovered off the bottom and seen their biggest surge in growth. For example, in March passenger vehicle sales increased just 6% from March 2010. I saw “just” because auto sales grew by 63% in March 2010. Annual auto sales are now forecast to grow by 10% to 15% in China n 2011. That’s certainly solid growth but it’s not the 32% annual growth the market saw in 2010.
You can see the same pattern in materials stocks. Copper, for example, is in a price decline that’s expected to last until the middle of 2011 before commencing a recovery that will take prices up 17% by the end of the year from the end of 2010. Copper demand is projected to grow by about 6% this year. Nothing wrong with any of those numbers but that’s not the jump in demand or price that you get in a commodity that’s coming off the bottom. In 2009 copper prices climbed about 120%, for example. In the late recovery stage, I think investors are looking at solid gains from materials stocks in emerging markets but not of the dimensions for 2009 and 2010.
As the global economy moves toward the late recovery stage, I think that even in emerging stock markets investors should add domestic growth companies to their holdings of materials and industrial stocks in emerging stock markets.
And that creates another challenge, No. 3, if you’re counting. It’s relatively easy for U.S.-based investors to buy the commodity producers and industrial companies of the emerging economies. Many are listed in New York, either directly or through ADRs (American Depositary Receipts.) A U.S. investor has no trouble buying shares of Brazilian iron ore producer Vale (VALE) or Brazilian steel producer Gerdau (GGB) or Brazilian sugar cane and ethanol processor Cosan (CZZ) that way.
But try to find a way to invest in Brazil’s or India’s or Indonesia’s domestic growth companies are the job gets much, much harder. So, for example, I like Brazilian cosmetics company Natura Cosmeticos as an investment in growing size and income of Brazil’s middle class. But while I can buy shares in Sao Paulo, they don’t trade in New York. Same with Lojas Renner, a Brazilian maker and retailer of women’s, men’s, and children’s fashions. Plenty of volume in Sao Paulo. Doesn’t trade in New York.
ETFs (exchange traded funds) don’t offer an easy solution for investors looking for domestic emerging market stocks. Because most ETFs are market cap weighted, their portfolios are dominated by commodities producers, telecommunication companies, and banks. Natura Cosmeticos is the 25th largest position in the iShares MSCI Brazil Index ETF (EWZ). Even the Market Vectors Brazil Small Cap EFT (BRF) doesn’t give an investor wide exposure to Brazil’s domestic growth companies.
So what’s a U.S. investor to do? Find multinationals investing heavily in Brazil’s domestic market. Unfortunately, the best bet of this sort, French cosmetics giant, L’Oreal trades most of its volume in Paris but it does trade in New York (LYRCY).
You can also buy the shares of domestic banks that track the Brazilian economy such as Itau Unibanco (ITUB) or Banco Bradesco (BBD). Unfortunately, I think you’re a little early on these since a slowing economy is creating worries about rising bad loans at some of Brazil’s more aggressive lenders.
There are a few Brazilian domestic growth companies listed in New York but such as brewer Ambev (ABV) and airline GOL (GOL) but you’re hardly looking at a big selection for building diversified exposure to Brazil’s domestic economy.
So why am I concentrating on Brazil if its domestic economy is such a tough nut to crack. First, because it illustrative of the problems investors face in building domestic growth portfolios in a big group of emerging markets that includes India, Indonesia, and Turkey. Second, because Brazil is the emerging market that I’d put at the top of my most timely list for emerging stock markets right now. I’d say it’s slightly ahead of Indonesia and Turkey and about three months ahead of China. And fourth, because Brazil is a good example of the trade-offs that face investors who want to put more money to work in emerging markets.
For example, it’s far easier to invest in China’s domestic economy—Internet portal Baidu (BIDU) and hotel chain Home Ins and Hotels Management (HMIN) both leap to mind as domestic Chinese companies that trade in New York without Brazilian counterparts.. So do you put more money into China than Brazil, even though the timing isn’t as good, simply because you can?
Or do you overweight less-than-ideal Brazilian companies such as Gerdau (which should get a big bump from Brazil’s drive to build out infrastructure for the Olympics and the soccer World Cup) and Gol (where oil prices do have to go down eventually, right?).
Or do you use multinationals such as L’Oreal or Nestle (NSRGY) to give you a bit more emerging markets exposure with the baggage of their developed economy business?
Not easy. Challenging in fact. There is no ideal solution. Mix a little of this solution and a little of that. Eventually more of these domestic growth companies will trade in New York. Until then we and our portfolios have to muddle through. (This problem, by the way, is one reason I started my mutual fund, Jubak Global Equity (JUBAX). As an institutional investor I can trade in many of the domestic stock markets in emerging economies.)
Full disclosure: I don’t own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this post in my personal portfolio. The mutual fund I manage, Jubak Global Equity Fund, may or may not now own positions in any stock mentioned in this post. The fund did own shares of Baidu, Cosan, Gerdau, Gol, Home Inns and Hotels Management, Itau Unibanco, L’Oreal, Lojas Renner, Natural Cosmeticos and Vale as of the end of January. For a full list of the stocks in the fund as of the end of January see the fund’s portfolio at http://jubakfund.com/about-the-fund/holdings/
Related Articles on STOCKS
The best way for investors to participate in digital transformation is PTC. Stock is up 42.3% thus f...
In the first and second parts of this series I showed you the ideal seasonal tendency chart of S&...
We still see the glass as half full, given likely decent global economic growth, healthy corporate p...