Headquartered in New Jersey and founded in 1891, Merck & Co. (MRK) is a global health care compa...
When would the U.S. default anyway? A default isn't default until the Fat Lady (or the bond market) sings
07/25/2011 2:31 pm EST
But what does default mean exactly? As the Greek debt crisis and the “solution” to that crisis show, very little about this process is cut and dried. And stuff that seems like it should be definite—like the very term “default” itself—is actually very, very squishy.
Turns out one of the big uncertainties is how long words—the last line of what I’d call the delay and deny defense when you’ve run out of money and borrowing room—can keep U.S. creditors at bay.
The whole default process--if Congress doesn’t raise the debt ceiling—will begin with a phone call sometime on or after August 2. The Federal Reserve will phone the U.S. Treasury and say something like, “Projecting the inflows and outflows to the Treasury’s account, the account will be overdrawn by the end of the day. Do you want to deposit more funds or cancel some of the scheduled payments?”
This part of the process is very clear cut. The Fed is required by law to make this phone call and by law it doesn’t have any wiggle room—the Fed isn’t allowed to let the Treasury overdraw its account. What happens next, thought, isn’t nearly as clear. And what the Treasury might do if it gets that call has as much to do with politics as it does with government finances.
The Treasury isn’t talking about what it might do in response to that phone call, partly at least because the last thing the Obama administration wants to do is tell Congress it might have more time to avert a disaster. My best guess now is that if the Treasury’s judgment is that buying Congress a few extra days will result in a deal that avoids default, then Treasury will find a trick or two or three—such as borrowing from Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac—to avoid a default. If the politics in Congress say that a few days won’t matter and that ratcheting up the pressure on Congress by holding back on issuing government checks or delaying payments due to vendors is more important, then Treasury will start to practice triage on the government’s obligations.
Would that be a default? As you and I understand the word, definitely. The U.S. would owe money to bondholders or Social Security recipients, or state governments, or military personal, or vendors who sold it everything from computers to light bulbs, and it won’t be sending out those payments on time. It has an obligation to pay and it isn’t living up to that obligation.
But the reality is that a borrower isn’t in default until a lender, creditor, or a credit rating agency says he or she is. And it’s frequently in the self-interest of the lending party or creditor not to call a default a default immediately.
You can see that in the Greek crisis where the solution patched together last week that would require bondholders to roll over bonds that are maturing into new bonds with longer maturities is actually a default. Bondholders would not be getting the payments and the return of capital guaranteed to them by their original investment. The debtor has acted, by forcing that roll over, to delay the repayment of capital. And that’s a default on the terms of the original debt.
But there’s a big incentive to creditors and lenders to call a default something other than a default. Calling the Greek default a default, for example, might well trigger all the credit default swaps and force sellers of that “insurance” in the derivatives market to pay up. (You might think that being able to collect on the insurance you’ve paid premiums to put in place would be attractive to those who bought the insurance, except that lots and lots of buyers are also sellers and no one is quite sure how the buying and selling would net out—especially if some sellers were found to owe more than they could pay.) Banks and national central banks and the European Central Bank don’t want to call a default a default either because that would destroy the value of collateral throughout the banking system and require central banks and national governments to find the money to capitalize banks that have, so far, funded themselves by borrowing against Greek government bonds. Politicians certainly don’t want to call a default a default because they’d be forced to go to taxpayers for the money to recapitalize affected banks.
So Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings are likely to call this a “selective default” or a “restricted default.” And that will let Greek creditors such as the European Central Bank pretend that a default isn’t really a default and to continue to lend money to Greek banks with Greek government debt as collateral.
The argument, flimsy as it is, for not calling this default a default and for not treating Greek government debt as defaulted debt is that the default won’t last for very long (maybe) and will be cleared up (possibly) as soon as the full rescue plan is in place.
I think we can expect something similar—a self-interested combination of delay and deny--if Congress fails to raise the debt ceiling.
And then it will be a race to see how long the words can hold the financial reality at bay.
As long as the U.S. default looks like it is going to be temporary, then the forces of delay and deny should be able to hold out. As the default stretches from days to weeks, however, delay and deny will gradually lose their holding power. More than a couple of weeks, I’d estimate, and delay and deny could be looking at a rout.
And it’s the bond market that’s likely to call Time in any post-default crisis.
The financial markets really don’t want to call a U.S. default a default. The credit default swaps market will initially vote that August 2 doesn’t constitute a credit event that would trigger payments from sellers to buyers of credit insurance. Institutional investors, including money market mutual funds, pension funds and insurance, have surveyed their boards to see if a temporary default would trigger their rules on the credit quality of their portfolios, and from the reports I’ve seen most boards have said that a temporary default wouldn’t require portfolio managers to sell their holdings of Treasuries. Overseas central banks and sovereign wealth funds don’t especially want to start selling their vast holdings of Treasuries since any significant selling will set off a drop in the value of the rest of the Treasuries in these portfolios. (That’s especially true since the turmoil in the euro market makes assets denominated in that currency an underwhelming alternative to Treasuries.) The repo, or repurchase markets, which use Treasuries as collateral for about 40% of what are, in effect short-term loans, doesn’t want to issue margin calls on trillions of dollars of these loans and risk a replay of Lehman Brothers and the global financial crisis.
But while the self-interest of the markets as a whole calls for looking past a U.S. default and calling it something else, the self-interest of individual players in these markets calls for getting out sooner rather than later. If you think the U.S. August 2 let’s-not-call-it-a-default is really going to turn into a debt market rout, you want to be the first out the door rather than caught in a later stampede.
So the United States has time but not very much time before a default is a default is a default, as Gertrude Stein put it.
How much time depends on the how slowly the bond market sells off U.S. Treasuries in Asia and in the United States. Selling that looks like it will accelerate into a rapid rise in yields and a quick drop in bond prices will put quite possibly intolerable pressure on the delay and deny defense. No portfolio manager, no matter what his board has said, wants to be accused of waiting too long to move. And every portfolio manager this week will be watching to see if the herd starts to break toward the exits. The slightest whiff of “Abandon ship” can easily turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
The U.S. debt markets are lucky in that the European debt crisis is still enough of a real danger so that the dollar and Treasuries have some allure at safe haven investments. (Granted that allure drops by the hour.) Any squabbling in Europe, any sign that the Greek deal is coming apart as the parties try to work out the details, will mean a little more strength for the dollar and a little more time for delay and deny.
On the minus side, well, there’s the U.S. Congress. After the collapse of talks on Friday and the truncated meeting on Saturday, Sunday brought a raft of proposals that were dead on arrival. The Republicans keep offering packages of cuts that Democrats won’t accept—especially because they have a very strong suspicion that none of these offers would get through the Republican-controlled (and I use the term “controlled” very loosely) House of Representatives. On the Democratic side President Barack Obama faces a near insurgency in his own party that threatens to turn into out-right rebellion if he accepts a deal with budget cuts and no revenue increases. Anything with revenue increases is almost certainly dead on arrival in the House.
If Standard & Poor’s and the bond market look at this wreck and see no chances for avoiding a default, the deny and delay defense will take a major blow. That’s why the cockamamie Reid-McConnell plan, which would allow President Obama to approve an increase in the debt ceiling while letting Congressional Republicans vote against any increase, is surprisingly pivotal. As convoluted as that plan is, and as dependent as it is on the arcane rules of Congress rather than on anything that approaches democratic process, it is the only plan on the table right now with a legitimate, if not especially large, chance at success.
If that plan dies and there’s nothing viable to replace it to give deny and delay some degree of plausibility, then it won’t matter whether anyone calls this default a default or a “short-term credit disruption.” The bond markets will speak, bond investors will run for the exits, and the U.S. default will be real.
Full disclosure: I don’t own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this post in my personal portfolio. The mutual fund I manage, Jubak Global Equity Fund http://jubakfund.com/ , may or may not now own positions in any stock mentioned in this post. For a full list of the stocks in the fund as of the end of March see the fund’s portfolio at http://jubakfund.com/about-the-fund/holdings/
Related Articles on STOCKS
Founded in 1902, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing (MMM) started as five businessmen set out to min...
Lack of conviction in this market has ironically contributed to how long it perseveres with rotation...
Two top picks in the commercial cybersecurity area are Fortinet (FTNT) and Palo Alto Networks (PANW)...