Many of you reading this probably remember when cash-back credit cards were a fresh idea. In 1985, t...
How Reliable Is This Jobs Number?
04/06/2012 5:29 pm EST
Not all that much, says MoneyShow’s Jim Jubak, also of Jubak’s Picks, and a disappointment now could be quietly revised upward in coming weeks.
Talk about a bad set up for the first-quarter earnings season that starts on Tuesday, April 10.
Today, the Department of Labor announced that the economy added just 120,000 jobs in March. That was down from 240,000 new jobs in February, and below the median forecast among economists surveyed by Bloomberg of 205,000. The March disappointment also broke a string of months with gains of 200,000 or more.
Today’s numbers are a dose of cold reality thrown on any inclination that the US stock market might have to look past disappointing first-quarter earnings figures on the hope that US economic growth for the rest of the year would be stronger than expected.
First-quarter earnings are forecast to have grown by just 0.93% from the first quarter of 2011, according to Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ. In the first quarter of 2011, the annual earnings growth rate was 19.7%.
The number of new jobs wasn’t the only measure that fell in March. Weekly hours worked fell to 34.5 from 34.6 in February. Hourly earnings increased by 0.2%, but with the economy creating only 120,000 new jobs in March, aggregate wages were flat on the month after climbing 0.7% in February. That’s not good news for an economy where consumer spending makes up 70% of all economic activity.
The official unemployment rate did drop to 8.2% from 8.3%, but that was only because 330,000 people left the workforce.
Oddly enough, the full unemployment numberâ€"the one that counts discouraged workers who have stopped looking for work and workers in part-time jobs who are looking for full-time jobsâ€"fell in March, to 14.5% from 14.9%.
That oddity raises an important question: Are today’s numbers correct?
The jobs numbers have been subject to huge revisions in the slow recovery from the Great Recession. Remember August 2010, when the initial report showed the economy added 0 jobs? That initial result was revised upward the following month, to 100,000.
Statistically, as Ezra Klein points out in his post on the Washington Post’s WONKBLOG today, there’s a 90% confidence level that the economy added somewhere between 20,000 and 220,000 jobs in March.
That’s quite a margin of error. In the short-term, I doubt that the market will care about the quality of this evidence of a slowdown in the economy.
In the short-term, this is yet one more reason to sell after the great first quarter rally. If you were inclined to think longer-term, however, I would wait for the revisions in early April before drawing any conclusions about US growth.
Related Articles on MARKETS
Electric vehicles — or EVs — are attracting customers at a far higher rate than first ex...
I expect stocks to have a good year, but 16.7% in returns is probably unlikely. It’s also wort...
Wednesday, March 21 is the pivot for the week as either Powell is perceived as hawkish and odds for ...