We added three high-yielding stocks last month to the Retirement Paycheck portfolio, and they alread...
Reformed Sinners: Today’s Best Bank Stocks
12/15/2009 10:05 am EST
With the financial sector in a correction, key survivors are newly humbled banks that can still afford some bargain takeovers. There are two standouts right now: One to buy and one to watch.
Ah, to be a healthy bank that dodged the latest financial crisis in residential mortgages and isn't cowering in fear of the new one in commercial loans.
You'd be hoovering up deposits from savers looking for safety. Licking your chops at all the tasty businesses that competitors not as skillful or lucky were selling off at bargain prices. And enjoying the steepest yield curve in 30 years, in which short-term deposits or borrowing costs near zero could be turned into loans prime (currently 3.25%) plus.
Actually, a bank doesn't have to be quite as pure as the driven snow to enjoy that paradise. You could even have taken a bath in the financial crisis. Issued mortgages to deadbeats. Bought your way into businesses you didn't understand at what turned out to be the peak of the market.
You could have done any and all of that—and still be in a position to clean up on the woes in the financial sector—as long as you've recovered more quickly than your peers. So desperate are investors and regulators for anyone to take the worst turkeys off their hands (before they turn into billion-dollar liabilities) that all past sins are forgiven, provided you've got a balance sheet now that looks strong enough to bear the load.
Banks such as these—I call them reformed sinners—are to me the most interesting and potentially profitable segment of the banking sector. Because they didn't dodge all the damage of the financial crisis, they didn't snap up big deals in the early days. So they're not full up.
But now that they have put their sins behind them to emerge as potential "rescuers"—rather than candidates for rescue—they're in a position to pick through what is still a most attractive and still growing pile of distressed financial companies.
I've got two banks like this to tell you about. One I'll add as a buy to Jubak's Picks. The financial sector is correcting now, and it's a reasonable time to add a financial stock. The other I'm going to put on my watch list because the financial sector's correction might have a way to go yet, and what's a bargain now might become a bigger bargain not too far down the road.
(By the way, I'll be launching a formal watch list in January. A number of readers have asked for a watch list, saying it would help them keep track of potential buys. I think it's a good idea, so I'll have it up as soon as the wonderful people I work with can get it built.)
In the Hands of Angry Regulators
Here's why I think reformed sinners are the best buys in the financial sector right now.
Regulators and worried investors have already tapped the most visible survivors of the financial crisis, and banks such as JPMorgan Chase are sitting back, stomachs full, still trying to digest the assets they have "rescued." JPMorgan Chase, for instance, acquired most of Washington Mutual for $1.9 billion to help out the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. That deal expanded JPMorgan's market share in California, but on top of the acquisition of Bear Stearns and the continuing integration of Bank One, I'd have to say that JPMorgan is done "rescuing" troubled financial companies for a while.
That means investors and Wall Street analysts are looking at something like a finished product. The JPMorgan Chase a year from now will be different from the JPMorgan Chase of today but in ways that are relatively predictable. The changes will be continuations of current trends. The company will integrate and rebrand acquisitions, get costs out, port products from one unit to another to create a uniform selling proposition, and build market share in key businesses by exploiting the base gained in these deals.
There's nothing wrong with predictability, especially when current trends are running so strongly in JPMorgan's favor. But because what you see today is what you'll get tomorrow—with a little intelligent extrapolation—the stock is likely to be more accurately priced by the market for its level of risk.
You may ask, more accurately than what? More than reformed sinner banks that are still in acquisition—I mean "rescue"—mode.|pagebreak|
One of these is U.S. Bancorp. On October 30, the bank helped out the FDIC by rescuing nine banks with $18 billion in assets and 150 branches in Texas, California, Illinois, and Arizona that had belonged to FBOP of Oak Park, Ill. (U.S. Bancorp subsequently sold off the three Texas banks it had acquired as part of that rescue.) Just weeks before that, in another transaction, U.S. Bancorp acquired $800 million in deposits in Arizona that BB&T had recently acquired in another "FDIC-facilitated transaction."
I think you get the idea.
There's no reason to believe that U.S. Bancorp is done, because the FDIC isn't done facilitating transactions. The agency's list of troubled banks climbed to 552 at the end of the third quarter. That's up from 416 at the end of the second quarter and is the largest the list has been since December 31, 1993, when, during the savings and loan crisis, it hit 575.
New Victims Ripe for Takeover
The troubled bank list this time around could still top the 1993 numbers. The banking crisis, rather than being over, has simply shifted focus. In 2008 and 2009, the crisis was all about residential mortgages and the derivatives built on them. That stage in the crisis isn't by any means resolved; mortgage foreclosures will hit a record in 2009 (see this recent blog post). But the crisis has now expanded to loans and mortgages on commercial real estate—you know, loans on malls, hotels, condominium developments, etc. Projections say defaults on those loans will be on the rise into 2011, at least.
That is extremely troubling because the default rate on those loans had already reached a 16-year high of 3.4% in the third quarter of 2009. According to Real Estate Economics, defaults could hit 5.3% within two years.
The names you're likely to hear in this commercial real estate phase of the financial crisis aren't the big boys like Citigroup and Bank of America, which played starring roles in the residential mortgage crisis. The commercial real estate crisis is focused on regional and community banks. Not only did they make lots and lots of these loans to local real estate developers, but their loan portfolios are also heavily weighted with those loans. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, these smaller banks have about four times the concentration in commercial real estate as the portfolios of the biggest US lenders.
The size of the banks that are likely to be in trouble over their commercial loans works to U.S. Bancorp's advantage, too. Acquiring one of those banks or a bunch of its branches and a hunk of its deposits is small change to a JPMorgan Chase. The deal is too small to be a game changer. That company needs a deal like its acquisition of Washington Mutual, which added 2,300 branches, to move the needle.
U.S. Bancorp isn't tiny by any means, but with just 2,800 branches in the United States, adding a few hundred here and a few hundred there has a bigger relative impact on the bank's bottom line. And especially on its strategy of funding its lending by gathering deposits. A bank's ability to grow its deposit base depends on its ability to dominate geography with branches and its brand.
Reformed sinner banks aren't limited to the United States. HSBC, for example, is a reformed sinner that is using this crisis to increase its already formidable presence in Asia.
HSBC fell hard in the crisis. The company spent $15 billion in 2003 to buy Household International in order to enter the US mortgage market. The timing of that deal was just right so that HSBC could get hammered in the US housing bubble and bust. Actual writedowns from the Household International business were about the same as what HSBC had paid to acquire the company. The math of that deal turned out to be like paying $15 billion to buy $15 billion in losses.
But reform took hold of HSBC hard in 2009. The bank closed its US consumer finance unit to new business in February and to its 800 HSBC branches that specialize in consumer lending. The bank has been running down its $62 billion US consumer lending portfolio since then. In April, the bank raised $17.7 billion in capital through a stock offering that it used to buttress its capital ratios. And, finally, HSBC chief executive officer Michael Geoghegan has announced that he will move his office to Hong Kong from London. That's a very visible affirmation of the bank's decision to return to its Asian roots. Hong Kong and the rest of Asia accounted for 26% of the bank's assets at the end of 2008.
That percentage looks likely to rise now that HSBC has emerged as the frontrunner to buy the Asian assets of troubled Royal Bank of Scotland. Those assets had looked like they would go to Standard Chartered earlier in the year, but that bank and Royal Bank of Scotland couldn't come to terms. On Thursday, the Financial Times reported that HSBC was close to striking a deal with Royal Bank of Scotland for the sale of 28 branches in India and 13 in China. In March, Royal Bank posted the biggest loss in the United Kingdom's corporate history. The bank is now majority owned by the government.
Royal Bank's stake in Asia isn't the last set of assets that troubled banks in the United Kingdom, Europe, and the Middle East will have to put up for sale. And HSBC will be there to make a go at any distressed asset sales.
With the Chinese economy set to return to 10% economic growth in 2010—how sustainable that will be for the long term is another story—and with Chinese exports likely to return to growth this quarter or next (see this recent blog post), owning a bank that owns an increasing bit of Asia's banking business seems like a good investment.
I'm adding HSBC to Jubak's Picks with this column. For more on my logic for the buy, watch for a new post on Tuesday (Dec. 15) that will further explain the rationale.
At the time of publication, Jim Jubak owned shares of the following companies mentioned in this column: HSBC, Standard Chartered and U.S. Bancorp. He plans to buy more shares of HSBC three days after this article is published.
Jim Jubak has been writing "Jubak's Journal" and tracking the performance of his market-beating Jubak's Picks portfolio since 1997 on MSN Money. He is the author of a new book, The Jubak Picks, and he writes the Jubak Picks blog. He is also the senior markets editor at MoneyShow.com.
Related Articles on STOCKS
When Blackberry (BB) was initially bought in our portfolio in 2013, some reckoned we were taking on ...
I don’t have any idea where the stock market will go over the short term. But I do know that i...
Stefanie Kammerman, The Stock Whisperer, to tell you the Whisper of the Week: FCX, IAU, F in my week...