Listen to OIC's Wide World of Option 54: The Rebranding of OCC and Stock Repair On Profiles & Pe...
Never Pay Retail for Options Again
05/27/2011 5:00 am EST
A former market maker reveals some helpful insights that will help retail traders get a better price for their options, thus maximizing their “edge” over fellow market participants.
The bid/ask pricing on an equity, index, or ETF option can vary from a couple cents to a couple dollars these days. In general, bid/ask spreads are narrower than in the past due to multiple exchanges, the prominence of electronic trading, and market makers competing for retail option order flow.
It’s important to remember that you don’t always have to pay the offer or sell the bid when you trade options. Especially when the spread between the bid/ask is wide, you can quite often successfully “work” a limit order that is much closer to the option’s true value.
What is an options true value? Well, there are theoretical values based upon implied volatility and the other option Greeks which are readily available on many trading platforms these days—but the rule of thumb I often use is to take the mid-price between the bid and ask as the “fair price” at that moment in time for the option.
Be sure to check a couple strikes around the one you are interested in as well, just to make sure that one particular option is not out of line in terms of pricing and implied volatility.
The primary obligation for market makers is to provide a liquid market and fill customer order flow. The key to remember is that the one of the main profit generators for Delta-neutral market makers is the bid/ask spread—because they “hedge off” the Deltas that they buy/sell when they take the other side of an order.
For every option buyer, there is a seller, and vice versa. The market making firm is on the other side of your transaction.
So the wider a bid/ask spread is, the more the theoretical (and often actual) profit margin that a market maker gains. For example, if an option is bid $2.00, offered $2.50, the market maker is paying $200 and selling for $250.
In a perfect world, he/she would buy and sell the exact same amount of those options for those exact prices, leaving a net position of zero at the end of the day and a risk-free arbitrage profit of $50 per contract traded.
In that hypothetical example, the overall profit margin of the bid/ask spread is 25%, also based on the mid-price (AKA the estimated fair value) of $2.25, and if you pay the straight ask or sell the bid, you’re giving up about 11% “edge” on both sides of the transaction to the market makers. So as a retail options trader, it’s in your best interest to narrow the spreads as much as possible.
In this example, if you paid $2.40 for the option, you’re lowering your cash outlay and maximum risk by $10 per contract, or about 4% from the $2.50 price. You’re also reducing the edge over fair value you give up to $15 from $25—down to only 6% profit margin on each side of the trade (much more reasonable, in my view).
The good thing is that nowadays with so much competition for option volume (and with $1 strikes, $0.01 price increments, etc.), you are much more likely in an example like the above to get filled on a limit order below the ask or above the bid.
In the “old” days of fraction option pricing when I was a CBOE floor market maker, the minimum increment on options was generally 1/8 on options over $3 (1/16 below that)—equating to $12.50 or $6.25. Today, you see $0.02 ($2) bid/ask pricing on the SPDRS, for example, a much better deal for retail investors.
When you are dealing with
“multi-legged” trades (those with more than one option involved) such as debit spreads, calendar spreads, credit spreads, butterflies, and condors, the effect of the bid/ask spread is multiplied.
You are dealing with 2x the bid/ask spread on most two-legged trades, for example. So it is even more important there to calculate a fair value and then work your order to not give up too much to those taking your trade.
NEXT: Recent Option Trading Example|pagebreak|
Recent Option Trading Example
Let’s look at a recent case study example of this from the ETF Tradr service. We had nice profits on the Merrill Lynch Regional Banks HOLDRs Trust (RKH) with a bearish put debit spread. RKH is one of those equities where the quoted prices on the options are often much wider than the “real” prices where you can get filled.
In this situation, our five-point debit spread was priced at $2.80 by $4.00 (our subscribers paid $2.20). In this case, you take the bid/ask average of $6.80/2, or $3.30, to garner what is the estimated real value at that moment in time.
So we issued our exit price alert to sell half the position at $3.20, giving up only $10 below what looked to be the fair value (additionally, this position was fairly deep in the money at this time, which made it more likely to be filled near the true value).
We basically got filled instantly at better prices than our limit order, and the quoted bid/ask prices narrowed significantly as well, for a time. You may wonder, why don’t they leave the bid/ask prices narrower all the time?
Well, on a security like this, it sometimes looks like there may be an unspoken agreement among those who make markets in the options to leave the bid/ask prices wider than they really are (to take advantage of market orders and novice traders). I’m not saying this is a nefarious conspiracy; it can just be that the primary market-making firm has a default bid/ask pricing in the computer with very wide bid/ask spreads.
Generally, low volume on either the underlying or its options can contribute to these wider posted bid/ask spreads. They also don’t want to be caught off guard by a slew of electronic orders that may precede a big move in the stock, so they give themselves more slippage by posting wider bid/ask spreads. Nonetheless, you don’t ever want to give up that much edge when trading.
Bottom line, we have more and more options with $1 strike-price increments and options that may have only a few cents between the bid/ask spread. This growing trend is beneficial to the retail trader, and if a security is moving very quickly (and has narrow spreads), you may not even want to work a limit below the offer or above the bid.
You must be aware of the bid/ask spread when trading, however, and don’t be afraid to work an order with limit prices closer to the mid-price, especially when spreads are wide.
Look at it as a percentage basis of the option’s cost—not the dollar amount. For example, $0.40 on a $2.00 option is 25%, while $0.40 on a $6.00 option is only 6.7%. Keeping in your pocket that extra $5, $10, $20, or more per contract when the pricing seems out of whack can add up to hundreds or thousands of dollars a year that you will be saving and put toward increasing your bottom line.
And with the increased competition among market makers and exchanges, you will get filled at your good limit price much more often that you think.
Just so you know that I know what I’m talking about, I did serve as an option market maker on the CBOE exchange.
By Moby Waller, contributor, BigTrends.com
Related Articles on OPTIONS
This rebroadcast of OIC's webinar panel program discusses how options professionals use technical an...
Are you curious about what Gamma Scalping is and how you can use it as a part of your investment str...
This rebroadcast of OIC's webinar panel discussion covers why implied volatility levels drive option...