How Zero Premium Sector Trade Works
05/28/2014 8:00 am EST
This strategy solves the problem of being right about a stock and wrong about the sector, writes the staff at Investopedia.com, and best of all, it is cost-effective.
One of the more popular ways that hedge funds make money is to be long and short on any number of combinations of stocks and/or other securities. The principle is simple enough: buy, for instance, the bank with the best fundamentals and most secure lending and investing book, and sell short its competitor that is in the hottest water. The difference in their respective stocks' performance becomes the trader's profit.
There are a number of variations on this theme, and a number of instruments that can be employed to effect the trade, from stocks to futures to options. Here we highlight one of them: a trading strategy that requires neither capital nor a hedge fund's leverage to put into play. It's called a zero-premium sector trade.
Why "Zero" Premium?
The trade is called zero-premium because it's essentially cost-free. An investor buys one call option and sells another of roughly equal value. The two trades offset one another, producing a net-zero total outlay for the investor.
How It Works
There's no getting around it; to employ this technique, an investor has to do his/her homework. Good research is the key to success with the zero-premium sector trade. Determining the best-run, most dominant company in a sector-the firm whose stock has the greatest probability of appreciating in value in the near term-is critical to creating the greatest return. That said, a profit can be had by finding a company that, at the very least, outperforms the sector.
When the research is done, one simply buys a call option on the stock, then simultaneously sells a call option of roughly equal value on the sector ETF. This shouldn't be a great challenge since most sector ETFs offer a great many option strikes to choose from. One also has to be sure that both options have the same expiry.
A Real-Life Example
Consider the following scenario: you believe that gold producer XYZ will significantly outperform its gold brethren over the next three months, so you purchase a six-month XYZ call option with strike price 45 (the stock now trades at $41.00) for $2.90.
At the same time, you sell one gold stock ETF (GDX) 44 call option for $2.90 (assuming the ETF is trading at $38.50. The trade is executed virtually cost-free (before commissions).
NEXT PAGE: Details of the Strategy|pagebreak|
There are now three possible outcomes for the trade:
- You are correct, and by expiration, XYZ rises roughly 25% to $51.00 and GDX rises only 15%, to $44.25. The long call is intrinsically valued at $6.00 ($51 - $45), and the short call is worth 25 cents ($44.25 - $44). Your total profit on the trade is $5.75. Not bad, for a net investment of $0 (less commissions).
- You are correct, but by expiration neither XYZ stock nor the ETF manage to climb above their respective strike prices. The options expire worthless, and you will have earned a loss equal to the size of your commissions paid.
- You are wrong, the ETF outperforms your chosen stock and you are on your way to a loss. Should this become apparent before expiration, it will be important to unwind the position, particularly if the sold call begins to trade at- or in-the-money. The reason for this is simple: In-the-money options are more sensitive in their movements than out-of-the-money, and your short call may increase in value much faster at this point than the long call.
Therefore, if, for example, XYZ and GDX both trade up to $44.00 (remember, the ETF started at a lower price), the short ETF call will now be worth $5.25, while the long XYZ call will only trade at $3.75. You will be at a negative $1.50 balance at this juncture with the action working against you. Again, it is best to unwind the position (i.e., sell the long call and buy back the short call) at a small loss.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Strategy
There are several advantages to the zero-premium options strategy, and they include, first, that the trade is virtually cost-free to execute. Additionally, it does not expose the trader to the overall performance of the market or the selected industry, since the investment is focused purely on the outperformance of your selected stock.
On the downside, the trade does require monitoring, and most brokerages will also require significant margin to cover the unhedged short call-likely in the neighborhood of 25% of the value of the underlying security. This is because, theoretically at least, the short call has unlimited risk. That said, the risk on a short ETF position is significantly less than on an individual company stock which might be subject to, for example, a one-time calamitous occurrence or a takeover or the like.
Who Should Use It and Under What Circumstances?
The trade is meant to be used by anyone with a good understanding of the mechanics of options trading and some experience in the actual buying and selling of options. It's patently not meant to be executed by an investor who hasn't the time to follow the position on a regular basis or who hasn't a good understanding of the basics of asset allocation. The last thing anyone should do is jump into the trade with three quarters of his or her portfolio.
The Bottom Line
The zero-premium sector trade solves the problem of being right about the stock and wrong about the sector. So long as you've done your homework and chosen an industry stalwart, it matters little if the overall sector falls out of favor. Even if Wall Street shuns the sector temporarily, the zero-premium trade can deliver considerable profits. And best of all, the trade is available at bargain basement prices.
By the staff at Investopedia.com