This is a rebroadcast of OICs webinar panel. In this deep dive discussion, Frank Fahey (representing...
Straddling the Fence
04/16/2015 8:00 am EST
Options instructor Russ Allen, of Online Trading Academy, follows up on his article on the three elements that make up an option trading opportunity by citing an example and weighing the pros and cons of betting on a large move of unknown direction with the straddle strategy.
Last week I wrote that an option trading opportunity consists of three elements:
- What do I think the stock price is most likely to do?
- What do I think the Implied Volatility of its options is most likely to do?
- How aggressive do I want to be?
Today we’ll look at an example.
On April 8, Amazon’s price chart looked like this:
The stock, at $381, was about in the middle of a range in which it had been moving for the last three months.
Implied volatility (a measure of how inflated its options were) was at a very low level, around its 25th percentile, as shown by the Implied Volatility Stochastic indicator at the bottom of the chart.
Note, on that indicator, the regular peaks at three-month intervals. These correspond to earnings announcement dates. In the weeks preceding the earnings announcements, Amazon’s options tend to inflate dramatically as traders anticipate that the announcements will have a big impact on the stock price.
This anticipation is not without reason. Notice the blue ellipses on the chart around the end of August, November, and January. These show large price gaps that happened when the announcements were made. This pattern of large price gaps on earnings dates has been commonplace for this stock for years.
How could we take advantage of the current situation?
Let’s look at our Big Three questions one at a time.
1. What do we think the stock price is most likely to do?
In this case, it was likely to move a large amount when earnings were released. In many cases in the past, this is what has happened. It is very common for AMZN to move 10% or more in a single day.
Unfortunately, the direction of that move is impossible to tell. I learned over many years being a controller of public corporations that even if you know exactly what the earnings number is going to be, you can never predict the market’s reaction to it. A stock can tank on great earnings if they weren’t great enough compared to expectations. Or it can fly on dud earnings if they were just less terrible than expected.
There are ways to bet on a large move of unknown direction. One of those is with a Straddle. In that strategy we buy both a call option and a put option at the same strike price, usually the one nearest the current price. If the stock moves by a large enough amount in either direction, one of those options could make enough money to pay for both, plus a profit. But it has to be a very large move.
Below is a payoff graph for a straddle on AMZN at the $380 strike:
We chose the July $380 options here, which would still have three months to run after the earnings announcement on April 23. The calls could have been bought at $23.65 and the puts at $22.15, for a total of $45.80 per share, or $4,580 per contract.
The green straight lines plot the profit or loss on the straddle position as a whole, at any stock price as of the expiration date of July 17. These green lines are not relevant to us (we have no intention of holding the position that long). We need to know what the profit or loss would be at different stock prices right before the announcement date, on April 22.
That is shown by the gray curved line which shows the projected profit or loss as of April 22 for any price of AMZN, assuming no change in implied volatility (the blue line shows the position’s profit or loss as of the entry date at any AMZN price).
In the table below the chart are selected AMZN prices which correspond to the vertical lines on the chart. I selected the price levels at which this trade would break even on April 22, if implied volatility remained constant. These prices were $354.50 on the downside (7.2% below current price) and $398.32 on the upside (4.36% above current price). If our plan was to close this trade before the announcement, and if implied volatility failed to budge, AMZN would have to go beyond one of those prices before the announcement for the trade to make money. Not impossible, but not too likely.
NEXT PAGE: Why Do I Call It a Lottery Ticket?|pagebreak|
I also located the price at which this trade would have the largest loss on April 22. That turned out to be with AMZN at $376, at which price the trade would lose about $357.00 (for the contract, not per share). This amount was 7.8% of the $4,580 capital at risk. Bear in mind, all of this is assuming implied volatility did not change between now and April 22.
But that leads to the next question:
2. What do I think the Implied Volatility is most likely to do?
AMZN’s implied volatility was extremely likely to rise for the next two weeks in the run-up to earnings. Then, immediately after the announcement, it would most likely collapse back to a low level again.
If implied volatility were to rise this time, just to the lowest pre-earnings volatility level of the last year, that would represent an increase of implied from here of over 68%.
Cranking in a 60% increase in implied volatility, the P/L graph changes to look like this:
Notice that if that increase in implied volatility were to happen before April 22, the entire gray P/L curve would move above the zero P/L line; in other words, the trade would then be profitable at any price of AMZN. The further away from the $380 strike the actual price was, the more profitable it would be.
A possible plan here would have been to buy more than one straddle—if we could afford it—and to sell some or all of them just before the announcement, regardless of where AMZN’s price was then. If the expected IV increase had happened, this would be profitable. If not, the loss would be quite small, probably less than $357 out of each $4580 risked, as described above.
If the stock had moved a great deal at that point, our profit would be greater; and if IV had increased a lot it would also be greater. If that were to be the case, we might want to sell enough of our positions to pay us back for the whole lot plus a profit and keep one or more as a lottery ticket.
Why do I call it a lottery ticket? Because once the announcement is out, implied volatility will definitely and instantly drop back down to a more normal level. This will decrease the value of all calls and all puts and will happen overnight when no orderly exit is possible. When the stock opens the next morning, the remaining straddles will only be profitable if the stock has, in fact, moved a very, very large amount away from where it closed the previous day. Otherwise, the drop in value due to the decrease in implied volatility will swamp the effect of stock price movement.
This last point is where our third question comes in:
3. How aggressive do I want to be?
If we decide to take this trade to begin with, the more aggressive way to go is to hold the lottery ticket, but we must realize that it is just that…something that has a small chance of a big payout and a large chance of a loss. The less aggressive stance would be to reap the benefits of the IV increase—if it happens—by selling the entire position before the announcement.
Straddles are fascinating and they sometimes pay off nicely. It is also true that they are more risky than they appear and must be chosen very carefully.
By Russ Allen, Instructor, Online Trading Academy
Related Articles on OPTIONS
Roma Colwell-Steinke of CBOEs Options Institute joins Joe Burgoyne in a conversation about strategy ...
This is a rebroadcast of OIC’s webinar panel where you can take a deep dive into options Greek...
Host Joe Burgoyne answers listener questions about mini-options and investor resources. Then on Stra...