Since Wednesday was PI day (3.14), I thought I might update my PI trade article, says Dave Landry, f...
10/23/2008 10:34 am EST
Since I have been traveling recently Dan Passarelli was kind enough to contribute an article this week. Dan is an experienced option trader and educator who has taught traders option strategies at both the Options Industry Council (OIC) and at the CBOE. He has been involved in the derivatives industry since 1993 and recently wrote an excellent book Trading Option Greeks. You can read my review of his book here and I appreciate Dan's contribution. --Tom Aspray
Is trading and gambling the same thing? Surely not! It's true, there are those traders who look at trading like gambling, but their careers generally don't last long. They are like tourists who arrive in Sin City with dreams of hitting it big at the roulette wheel and wind up with hardly enough for cab fare to get back to the airport.
There are, however, some relevant similarities between gambling and trading. Most importantly, they are both statistical endeavors that revolve around edge. In Las Vegas, edge is the term used for the house's long-run, statistical advantage. The idea is that, if you sit down and play one hand of blackjack, the casino may win or may lose. If you play 1,000 hands of blackjack, the house is likely to be an overall winner.
In trading, there is a "house" as well. The house, in this case, is the liquidity provider-a.k.a. market maker. Each trade a market maker makes may be a winner or a loser. But because these traders can buy the bid and sell the offer, they have a statistical edge over you, the "retail" trader. That is, they always buy at a cheaper price and sell at a higher price. So, where does that leave the retail trader?
Just like at the craps table, players can improve their statistical disadvantage of a pass-line bet by taking odds. They can use some techniques to help overcome the house's edge and maybe even gain an edge in terms of statistical chances of success.
An important influence on a retail trader's edge is vega-one of the option Greeks. Vega is the rate of change of an option's value relative to a change in implied volatility. To understand vega, let's get better acquainted with the concept of volatility.
Options and Volatility
Option values have three main influences: the price of the underlying, time to expiration, and volatility. The influence of the price of the underlying is fairly intuitive to even novice option traders. As the stock or index price rises, calls rise and puts decline. As the stock or index falls, calls decline and puts rise. These changes in option value due to direction are measured by the option Greek delta.
The effect of time is a relatively easy to grasp concept as well. If you bought an option for, say, $2, would you rather it have one week till expiration or one year? Clearly (all else held constant) the more time your option has to expire the better. Therefore, as time passes, options lose value (again, all other factors held constant). This change is measured by theta.
But the trickier and (arguably) more useful pricing factor for gaining in the effects of edge is that of volatility. The volatility of stock price movement can be measured by the stock's standard deviation. Typically, this figure is annualized for comparison purposes. The annualized standard deviation of a stock is often referred to as realized volatility. This figure is stated as a percentage of the stock's price. A typical realized volatility figure is generally between 10 percent and 50 percent-10 percent being not very volatile and 50 percent being fairly volatile-though the figure can be above or below that range, even significantly. The bigger the realized volatility percentage, the larger the stock's price swings have been lately.
Volatility is a factor of option pricing. When the market expects volatility to be high, upward price pressure is put on options as hedgers and speculators create demand. Likewise when traders bank on lower volatility, hedgers and speculators freely supply the market with options putting downward pressure on prices. In this context, volatility is called implied volatility. Implied volatility is the volatility component of an option's price.
Imagine two scenarios. In both situations, the underlying stock pays no dividend and is trading at $45 a share. In Scenario 1, the December $45 call is trading at $1.50, and in Scenario 2, the December $45 call is trading at $4.00. Why are the two otherwise identical calls different? Implied volatility. The December $45 calls in Scenario 1 have an implied volatility of around 17 percent, and the implied volatility for the calls in Scenario 2 is about 49 percent. Big difference.
In either case, a clever trader can compare the implied volatility of the options with the realized volatility of the stock. That is, given a particular realized volatility figure, the trader can compare the actual stock volatility with the volatility implied by its options. This is one measure traders look at to gauge the relative expense of options.
So, the real question is: How does this help in the edge department?
Imagine the same two scenarios as mentioned above. Now consider the "price" of the options (as measured by implied volatility) if the realized volatility of the underlying stock is 25 percent. The calls in Scenario 1 are priced lower than the volatility of where the stock is trading. The calls in Scenario 2 are priced higher than the realized volatility.
Consider then a trader interested in buying a December $45 call because he believes the stock will rise (i.e., it is underpriced). How did the trader arrive at such a forecast? It is likely he considered several indicators from a technical analysis perspective in conjunction with a fundamental analysis. Why several technical indicators and a fundamental review-to give the trader the maximum chance of success, or edge, directionally.
If this trader is indeed clever, he will also examine the option's price in terms of volatility. Volatility is, after all, a component of its price; it is one of the things the trader is considering buying. He will take note of whether the option is overpriced or underpriced in terms of implied vs. realized volatility.
We can take some of the mystique out of implied volatility by considering the call purchase graphically. Figure 1 shows two simple at-expiration P&L diagrams for the calls in the two different volatility scenarios.
Clearly the call purchased in the higher implied volatility scenario ($4.00) is at a disadvantage compared with the one bought for the lower implied volatility ($1.50). The disadvantage is that the underlying stock must rise much more for the option to break even at its expiration. To point out the obvious, it is more advantageous to buy less expensive options. But these diagrams point out that the difference is due to the implied volatility level at which the option is initially purchased. Directionally speaking, as the underlying stock moves lower, the 49 percent volatility option will lose more by expiration. As the underlying rises, it needs to rise more for the option with 49% implied volatility to make up for the relatively more expensive premium. The best way to truly gauge the relative cheapness or expensiveness of the option-barring directional considerations-is to look at the implied volatility.
There is, however, one more thing to consider. If implied volatility is higher than realized volatility, it may be because the market expects the future volatility of the underlying stock to be higher than it has been lately (i.e., realized volatility). The market, therefore, would "price in" higher future volatility into the price of the options.
Remember, using realized and implied volatility can help a trader gain edge, but it cannot guarantee success. Again, if one hand of blackjack or another table game is played, the house may or may not win. But the more edge the house has in a game, the greater the chances of success the house has in the long run. Likewise, studying implied volatility helps traders better understand whether the options are cheap or expensive in terms of volatility.
Dan Passarelli is the author of the book Trading Option Greeks and the founder of Market Taker Mentoring, which provides personalized one-on-one mentoring to option traders. If you have any questions about the article Dan can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Options involve risk and are not suitable for all investors. Before trading options, please read Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Option (ODD) which can be obtained from your broker; by calling (888) OPTIONS; or from The Options Clearing Corporation, One North Wacker Drive, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60606. The content on this site is intended to be educational and/or informative in nature. No statement on this site is not intended to be a recommendation or solicitation to buy or sell any security or to provide trading or investment advice. Traders and investors considering options should consult a professional tax advisor as to how taxes may affect the outcome of contemplated options transactions.
Related Articles on STRATEGIES
Activist investing continues to gain advocates — and capital; according to Hedge Fund Research...
While the Dow has not stayed on the balance line we’ve discussed in recent updates, last Frida...
We must apply a high degree of logic in our daily lives to survive and prosper. Yet, in trading, the...