This is a rebroadcast of OICs webinar panel. In this deep dive discussion, Frank Fahey (representing...
Am I Losing Money When Option Value Increases?
06/25/2014 8:00 am EST
A lot of traders think that if option value increases, terrible losses are on the imminent horizon, but Alan Ellman of TheBlueCollarInvestor.com explains why this is simply a common misconception.
The risk in covered call writing is in the stock purchased not in the option sold. Sound familiar? It’s in all my books and DVD Programs and mentioned in my seminars and webinars. Yet it appears when we look at our brokerage statements that this concept is not true. That is because we see a minus sign after having sold the option and the number adjacent to that minus sign gets larger and larger if the value of the option increases. That leads some investors to believe that if option value increases, there are terrible losses about to be realized…not true.
To explain, let’s have a look at Halliburton Company (HAL) where the following covered call position was established:
- Buy @ $62
- Sell the $62.50 call @ $125
- A 2% initial return is generated
- The price of HAL begins rising after the covered call position is executed
Next, let’s have a look at the price action of this option as share price rises:
As the price of HAL rises to $64.38, the option value moves above $2…are we now losing $75 per contract?
Before we answer that question, let’s view the price chart for HAL which is fueling the rise in option value:
We have learned from studying the Greeks that an option value will change by its delta for every $1 increase or decrease in share value. We also know that, as a strike moves deeper in-the-money (as this option is doing) the delta moves higher or closer to “1" in this case, the option is nearly $2 in-the-money, so the intrinsic value alone is close to $2. In this case, theta (time value erosion) is having a lesser impact on option value than is delta.
Are we now losing money on the option side? No, we are not. The minus sign or (Brackets) displayed in our broker statements are there for accounting reasons and mean that we have an “open” position which, in order to close, would leave us in a net debit position (a loss). However, the choice to close the position is totally ours to make and will not be executed unless it is in our best interest. For example, we may close the short position if rolling the option on or near expiration Friday will result in a net credit that meets our goal. Another example where we may close our short position at a higher price than entered is when we execute the mid-contract unwind exit strategy. These two scenarios are favorable trades that generate additional cash flow in our portfolios.
Finally, we can take no action at all. If the price of the stock is above the strike and it doesn’t make financial sense to close the short position, we allow assignment—which means that we have maxed our trade. We received the initial option premium plus any share appreciation from purchase price to the strike and our shares are sold for the price we agreed to sell them for when the trade was initiated. The cash is then used to establish a new covered call position the following week. Once the position is closed, the negative (brackets) signs will disappear in our broker statements and our option gains will be realized.Rising option value is a positive for us despite the negative appearance on our brokerage statements. Our main concern is when share value declines and in that case so will option value.
By Alan Ellman of TheBlueCollarInvestor.com
Related Articles on OPTIONS
Roma Colwell-Steinke of CBOEs Options Institute joins Joe Burgoyne in a conversation about strategy ...
This is a rebroadcast of OIC’s webinar panel where you can take a deep dive into options Greek...
Host Joe Burgoyne answers listener questions about mini-options and investor resources. Then on Stra...