Options Pros Talk Put-Call Parity and More This rebroadcast of OICs webinar panel on Put-Call Parity...
Options for Beginners—Part 3
05/21/2015 8:00 am EST
Options instructor Russ Allen, of Online Trading Academy, offers the third part of his Options for Beginners series. By citing this powerhouse social media company as an example, he offers a comparison between the purchase of call options and the purchase of the stock itself.
So far we’ve defined some key terms and described why options are an attractive vehicle for leveraged speculation, for hedging a stock position, or for conservative income generation. Last time, our emphasis was on the use of options as a leveraged speculation. Its main lesson was that if we use options for this purpose we have to be correct on the direction of the movement of the stock. Standing still won’t do, the stock must move the way we believe it will and it must do it soon.
Let’s continue in that facet of options with another example.
Facebook (FB) went public three years ago with an incredible amount of hype. After the IPO, the shares dropped by about 60% over the next five months. Ever since, though, the stock has been in a strong long-term uptrend. Recently, there was a pullback following disappointing earnings. That appears to have bottomed out and the stock is now at a level that looks like it could provide strong support for a new leg up. Here is its chart as of May 7:
Let’s now compare the purchase of call options to the purchase of the stock itself.
A hundred shares of the stock would cost $7,843. If we bought the stock, we’d look for a rally back up to the area of the recent highs, say to $86.00 per share. If that occurred, we could make $8600 – $7843 = $757 on our $7843 investment. That is a profit of 9.7%. Looking at Facebook’s chart—in the past—a move of this magnitude has taken between one and two months to complete. If we allow two months, that 9.7% profit equates to an annual return of almost 60%. Not bad.
If Facebook were to drop below the current demand zone, say to $77.00, we would exit the trade. In that case, our loss would be $7843 – $7700, or $143.
Now let’s look at the possibility with options.
The July 77.50 call options could be bought for $3.90 per share or $390 for a 100-share contract (almost all options are in 100-share contracts). If Facebook did reach $86.00 per share when these options expired in July, the call options would be worth about $8.50 per share, or $850 for the contract. This is because they allow the holder of the calls to buy the stock at what would then be an $8.50 per share discount (the $77.50 options strike price vs. the $86.00 market price). We could realize that profit in one of two ways.
NEXT PAGE: The Eye-Opening Chart of How These Alternatives Compare|pagebreak|
One way would be to exercise the call options (i.e. surrender the options plus $7,750 in cash and receive 100 shares of Facebook in exchange). We could then sell the Facebook shares at the market price of $86.00 per share. Our gross profit on the exercise would be our $8600 sale price, less our $7750 cost, or $850 total. From this we would have to subtract our $390 cost for the option, leaving a net profit of $850 – $390 = $460.
The second, easier way to realize our profit would be simply to sell the call options themselves. Since they would provide the right to exercise and collect the $850 per 100 shares positive cash flow, they would be selling at $850 per contract at that time. We could simply sell the calls themselves for $850 and realize the same gross and net profit without ever owning the Facebook stock at all and without ever going out of pocket by more than $390.
Either way, with FB at $86.00, our $460 profit on a $390 investment would equal a 118% gain in 71 days, which is over a 600% annualized return. There’s your leverage.
But if the stock was below the $77.50 call strike price on July 17 when the call options expired, then the options would be worth nothing. In that case, we would have lost our $390 investment. So this is how these two alternatives compare:
The calls’ much larger potential percentage gain at our target is not free. In this example, should the stock not go our way, we could lose $390, which is more than the stock position would lose if we got out at our $77.00 stop loss price. Note though that the $390 loss on the call is the absolute maximum, even if we should wake up one morning and find that Facebook had gone out of business. In that unhappy event, the call would be worth nothing and we would be out $390. But if we had owned the stock instead, our stop-loss on the stock would not have helped us and we could theoretically lose the entire $7843 investment.
In summary, the call position has a much larger potential profit percentage; and it comes with a risk that is small in absolute dollar terms, is much smaller than the risk of owning the stock itself, but large as a percentage of the amount invested. Compared to the investment in the stock, the call purchase is much more aggressive.
We’ll check in on this trade next time and continue with our exploration of option basics.
By Russ Allen, Instructor, Online Trading Academy
Related Articles on OPTIONS
OIC instructor Bill Ryan joins host Joe Burgoyne in a discussion about protection strategies. Then, ...
This rebroadcast of OIC's webinar panel discussion covers why implied volatility levels drive option...
I always find it fascinating to see what kind of big trades are being made in the options markets. S...